Most project management tools assume you already have a plan — they hand you an empty board and a task list. Projektiassistent starts earlier: describe the project in your own words and the AI drafts the objectives, activity plan, schedule, budget and risks. Only then do you manage them in a Gantt or Kanban view.
Project management software is not a task list. For a project to get from idea to result, one system has to cover five things at once — and they have to be connected, not sitting in five separate files.
Objectives, deliverables and a work breakdown. Without them a schedule is just a list of dates.
Milestones, the critical path, and what happens when one activity slips.
Cost lines net and with VAT, the free balance, and their link to activities.
A risk register with mitigations, and a trail of who decided what.
Who does what, how much each person already carries, and where overload builds up.
Status for management and funders — without writing it up by hand every time.
In a classic tool you enter the same information several times: once into the plan, once into the schedule, once into the budget, once into the report. Here they are different views of the same project — change one and the rest follow.
An empty template is why many projects never start. You edit a draft instead of starting from nothing.
Move a deadline in the Gantt view and the schedule, workload and reporting update with it.
The system shows what is still missing for a decision, before the project goes live.
Run the same project in Estonian, English or Russian — useful when the funder is not local.
Most comparisons list features. In practice six things decide whether a tool stays in use or is abandoned in month two. Work through them before moving a team onto anything new.
If the tool hands you an empty board, the first project takes days — and often never gets written at all. Ask what happens in the first quarter of an hour: are you filling in a template, or editing a draft that already exists?
Test it for real: move one deadline and see whether the budget, workload and report follow. If they don't, you will be syncing three files by hand, and by month three they will have drifted apart.
A translated interface is not the same as content in your language. Check whether the AI writes the plan, application and report in it, whether the VAT logic matches your country, and whether local funders' requirements are understood.
If the project needs a grant, the application and the later report are two shapes of the same content. A tool that doesn't know this means writing the project up twice.
The licence is the smaller cost. The bigger one is the hours people spend learning it, and how many go back to a spreadsheet anyway. Pick a tool whose first project happens without training.
Who sees the budget, who may change the plan, and whether changes leave a trail. In a grant-funded project that is an audit question, not a convenience one — GDPR and version history have to hold.
Every view is a different angle on the same project. Pick the one that matters most to you.
Describe the project in your own words — the AI drafts a structured plan.
→🛑The system tells you what is still missing for a decision.
→🧩Break the project down: tasks, subtasks and a WBS.
→📊Schedule, dependencies and milestones — generated from your plan.
→🔀Task flow in columns — tied to the plan, not a separate list.
→🧭Scrum, Kanban, Waterfall, PRINCE2, hybrid or simple project.
→👥Who is overloaded and who is free — before a deadline slips.
→⚠️Risk register, impact–probability matrix and mitigations.
→💶Cost lines, VAT and free balance in real time — ready for reporting.
→📊A status report for management in seconds, not hours.
→🗂️Every project on one screen — an aerial view, not a magnifying glass.
→🤝Share the project, set permissions, keep data separated.
→🧠Chat, recommendations, what-if and meeting notes in one.
→🔌REST API, webhooks, Slack, Teams and calendar.
→🔒Layered access control, audit log and GDPR compliance.
→A construction project, an IT build, a municipal investment and an NGO grant project behave differently. See how the platform works in your field.
Strategic initiatives and EU projects — audit-readiness and VAT tracking.
→🏘️Investments, development plan and public space — audit-readiness and VAT.
→🏗️New builds, renovation and design — plan, budget and dependencies.
→💻Software development, MVP and integrations — Scrum, Kanban and What-If.
→🤝Events, community projects and grants — precise control on a tight budget.
→🧭Many clients, one workspace — portfolio, budgets and applications at once.
→From the same project the AI drafts a structured grant application. EAS, KIK, PRIA and European Union programmes.
From a project plan to a structured application — several from one project.
→🚀Business and innovation grants — an application from your project plan.
→🌱Environmental and energy projects — measurable impact in the application.
→🌾Agriculture and rural life — investments, LEADER and community projects.
→🇪🇺EU funding for companies and NGOs — English application included.
→Trello, Asana, MS Project and Jira are good at managing tasks. Here is an honest comparison — including when they are the better choice for you.
Kanban is fine — but plan, budget and applications live outside Trello.
→🧭Strong work management — but funding and applications stay outside.
→📐Scheduling power without the learning curve — plus funding and AI.
→🧰Jira is for development teams — a project manager needs something else.
→Project management software is a system where a project's plan, schedule, budget, risks, team and reporting live in one place and are connected to each other. Unlike a task manager, the goal is not just tracking tasks but being able to make a decision about the project at any moment.
Excel does not know that moving a deadline affects the budget and the workload — you have to redo that everywhere by hand. Here those are linked, every change is kept in history, and reports come from the same content automatically.
No. Describe in your own words what you want to do and when it has to be finished, and the AI builds the structure. You pick a methodology (Scrum, Kanban, Waterfall, PRINCE2 or a simple project) only when you care to.
Estonian, English and Russian in full, including AI-generated plans, applications and reports. The same project can be kept in more than one language.
The trial is 14 days free with all Pro features and no card required. After that Pro is €29/month and Business €99/month; VAT is added.
Yes — an ongoing project can be brought in and managed onward. An API and webhooks let you connect the platform to your existing workflow, including Slack and Teams.
Projektiassistent is free to try for 14 days — all Pro features, no credit card. After that Pro is €29/month and Business €99/month, plus VAT. There is no permanently free plan, because AI requests are a real cost on every plan.
In a small company the project manager usually has another job as well. What matters then is how quickly a first plan appears and how little manual syncing is left over. MS Project and Jira need someone to configure them — the comparison pages spell that difference out.
14 days free — all Pro features, no card required.
Start for free →