A good-looking plan and a decision-ready plan are not the same thing. Projektiassistent assesses whether the project is substantively feasible — whether the assumptions hold, the risks are identified, the owners are named and the funding conditions are met — and shows what is still missing, before money and time are spent.
An analysis layer detects contradictory or incomplete input. This is not form validation — the system looks at whether the parts of the plan agree with each other.
Whether all required parts are filled in and substantively consistent. A half-finished plan stays a draft.
Schedule, budget and resources are checked against each other automatically. If the budget does not cover the planned work, you see it immediately.
Every decision, risk and milestone has a named owner. No tasks that belong to everyone and no one.
A project counts as decision-ready only when the material components are evidenced — not when the fields are filled.
When those questions come up a month later, the answers are there. The decision log ends the "but we agreed…" arguments and makes an audit straightforward.
If critical assumptions, permits or funding conditions are unmet, the project stays a draft. You will not launch half a plan by accident.
Material decisions are recorded with their context, rationale and decision-maker, in chronological order.
Earlier plans can be restored — during an audit you can show how the plan developed and why.
Readiness is not a one-off check at launch. Every change is reassessed, so a half-finished state does not go unnoticed.
It is a project the responsible person can decide on without asking for more information: measurable objectives, a schedule and budget that agree, identified risks and named owners. Most plans fall short of that bar because something was left as an unstated assumption.
No. A draft can be edited and extended freely. The restriction applies only to formal approval and the delivery stage — the system will not let you launch a project whose critical assumptions are unmet.
Some come from the project type and the chosen methodology, some from the funding conditions you attach to the project. You can always see which check is unmet and why.
Yes — every decision is stored with a timestamp, an author and a rationale, and earlier versions of the plan can be restored. In an audit you can show not just the outcome but how it was reached.
Describe the project in your own words — the AI drafts a structured plan.
→🧩Break the project down: tasks, subtasks and a WBS.
→📊Schedule, dependencies and milestones — generated from your plan.
→🔀Task flow in columns — tied to the plan, not a separate list.
→🧭Scrum, Kanban, Waterfall, PRINCE2, hybrid or simple project.
→👥Who is overloaded and who is free — before a deadline slips.
→⚠️Risk register, impact–probability matrix and mitigations.
→💶Cost lines, VAT and free balance in real time — ready for reporting.
→📊A status report for management in seconds, not hours.
→🗂️Every project on one screen — an aerial view, not a magnifying glass.
→🤝Share the project, set permissions, keep data separated.
→🧠Chat, recommendations, what-if and meeting notes in one.
→🔌REST API, webhooks, Slack, Teams and calendar.
→🔒Layered access control, audit log and GDPR compliance.
→14 days free — all Pro features, no card required.
Start for free →