Microsoft Project is the classic scheduling tool and it does scheduling thoroughly. The price is the learning curve — and the fact that the substance of the project, the objectives, funding and applications, sits outside it. Projektiassistent gives you the schedule without training and adds what MS Project does not cover.
MS Project assumes you can already build the project structure yourself and gives you powerful means to time it precisely. Projektiassistent builds the structure for you and covers the funding side too.
Schedule, dependencies and milestones are generated from the plan — you do not build them by hand.
Describe the project in your own words and get the structure. In MS Project you start from an empty task grid.
Cost lines, VAT, free balance and grant applications — the part a scheduling tool does not cover.
No licence to install and no fighting through unfamiliar terminology.
MS Project is a deep tool in its category and in some cases has no good substitute. Switching makes sense when you do not need that depth but need everything around it.
Large construction and manufacturing projects where resource levelling and load optimisation are daily work.
Tight integration with the rest of the Microsoft estate and existing licences can outweigh other arguments.
When the schedule is only one part and the real pain is in drafting the plan, the budget, the risks and the applications.
The comparison covers what affects day-to-day usability and the project as a whole. Licences and features change — check both vendors' own sites.
| Projektiassistent | MS Project | |
|---|---|---|
| Gantt and dependencies | Yes, from the plan | Yes — its strength |
| Critical path and slack | Yes | Yes, very detailed |
| Detailed resource planning | Basic | Yes — its strength |
| AI-generated project plan | Yes, from a description | No |
| Budget and VAT | Yes | Limited |
| Grant application drafting | Yes | No |
| Estonian-language environment | Yes (et / en / ru) | Limited |
| Getting started | In the browser, no training | Licence and learning curve |
For most projects, yes — Gantt, dependencies and milestones are there, plus the plan, budget and applications. For detailed planning of very large, resource-heavy construction projects, MS Project is still deeper.
No. The schedule is generated from the project plan and you adjust dates by dragging.
No, Projektiassistent runs in the browser.
Estonian, English and Russian across the environment and the AI, which reduces translation errors in reports and applications.
In practice you start from a project description that the AI turns into a plan — usually faster than transferring an old schedule row by row.
Kanban is fine — but plan, budget and applications live outside Trello.
→🧭Strong work management — but funding and applications stay outside.
→🧰Jira is for development teams — a project manager needs something else.
→📊A spreadsheet holds until the first slip — then schedule and budget drift apart.
→14 days free — all Pro features, no card required.
Start for free →